Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cortical potentials evoked with speech stimuli were investigated in ten experienced cochlear implant (CI, type Nucleus 24M) users using three different speech-coding strategies and two different speech contrasts, one vowel (/i/-/a/) and one consonant (/ba/-/da/) contrast. On average, results showed that, compared to subjects with normal hearing, P300 amplitudes were smaller; however, most latencies were within the normal range. Next, individual P300 measures in response to the two speech contrasts were compared to behavioral discrimination scores. Significant within-subject differences in P300 amplitudes and latencies were found for the three speech coding strategies. These differences were in agreement with the behavioral, strategy-dependent discrimination of the speech contrasts. Se investigaron los potenciales corticales evocados con estímulos de lenguaje en diez usuarios experimentados de implante coclear (CI tipo Nucleus 24M) utilizando tres diferentes estrategias de codificación del lenguaje, y dos diferentes contrastes de lenguaje, el contraste de una vocal (/i/-/a/) y una consonante (/ba/-/da/). En promedio, los resultados mostraron que, comparados con sujetos normo-oyentes, las amplitudes de las ondas P300 fueron menores; sin embargo, la mayor parte de las latencias estuvieron dentro de límites normales. Luego, se compararon las medidas individuales de la P300, en respuesta a los dos contrastes, con los puntajes de discriminación. Se encontraron diferencias significativas intra-sujeto en las amplitudes y latencias de la P300, en las tres estrategias de codificación del lenguaje. Estas diferencias correlacionaron con las discriminaciones conductuales, estrategia-dependientes, de los contrastes de lenguaje.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beynon et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: