Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Activity-based interventions such as locomotor training or passive cycling have a positive influence on the spinal circuitry and recovery following a spinal cord injury (SCI). The use of quipazine in combination with exercise training has demonstrated a greater functional recovery than has exercise training alone. However, the influence of exercise or training on the responsiveness of the spinal cord to quipazine has not been examined following a chronic spinal transection. The purpose of this study was to characterize the flexor and extensor monosynaptic reflex (MSR) response pre- and post-quipazine in chronic complete spinally transected rats that either underwent daily passive cycling for 3 months or did not receive passive cycling. Following a chronic spinal transection, the extensor MSR demonstrated a hyperreflexive response (fivefold increase) to afferent stimuli, and did not respond to quipazine injection. With daily passive cycling, the extensor MSR hyperexcitability was attenuated, and the MSR amplitude increased 72% following quipazine injection (p<0.004), which was comparable to the extensor MSR response (94%) in the control group. For both chronic spinal transection groups, the flexor MSR amplitudes were not altered following quipazine injection, whereas in the control group the flexor MSR amplitude increased 86% in response to quipazine (p<0.004). These results demonstrate that passive cycling attenuates the hyperreflexive response of the extensor MSR following a chronic SCI, and restores the MSR response to quipazine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chopek et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: