Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seven isomeric 4,5,6‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3,2‐dioxathians, cis ‐4‐ trans ‐6‐dimethyl‐ r ‐2‐oxo‐1,3,2‐dioxathian and two isomeric 4,5,5,6‐tetramethyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3,2‐dioxathians were prepared and their 1 H n.m.r. spectra analysed. The values of the vicinal coupling constants reported earlier for the cis ‐4‐ trans ‐6 compound were shown to be erroneous. In all cases the values of the vicinal coupling constants (and those of the chemical shifts) are indicative of a single chair conformation or a chair‐chair equilibrium, in contrast to earlier reports on the significant contribution of twist forms but in agreement with an electron diffraction study. The chair form is ≳ 31 kJ mol −1 thermochemically more stable than the twist form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikander et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: