Key result
Participants in a 12-week home-based cardiac telerehabilitation program demonstrated high adherence, completing a median of 86% of exercise goals, and rated the system as highly usable with a median System Usability Scale score of 83.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation reduces morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction, but feasibility of a health watch-informed 12-week cardiac telerehabilitation program in survivors who declined center-based rehabilitation needed evaluation.
Is a 12-week health watch-informed cardiac telerehabilitation program feasible and usable for acute myocardial infarction survivors who decline center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
Observational (n=18)
No
Is a 12-week health watch-informed cardiac telerehabilitation program feasible and usable for acute myocardial infarction survivors who decline center-based cardiac rehabilitation?
A home-based cardiac telerehabilitation program utilizing a health watch and weekly nurse counseling is feasible, highly usable, and achieves high exercise adherence in post-myocardial infarction patients who decline center-based rehabilitation.
Supports home-based cardiac telerehabilitation feasibility; hypothesis-generating for efficacy and scalability pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation programs, consisting of exercise training and disease management interventions, reduce morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we aimed to developed and assess the feasibility of delivering a health watch-informed 12-week cardiac telerehabilitation program to acute myocardial infarction survivors who declined to participate in center-based cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: We enrolled patients hospitalized after acute myocardial infarction at an academic medical center who were eligible for but declined to participate in center-based cardiac rehabilitation. Each participant underwent a baseline exercise stress test. Participants received a health watch, which monitored heart rate and physical activity, and a tablet computer with an app that displayed progress toward accomplishing weekly walking and exercise goals. Results were transmitted to a cardiac rehabilitation nurse via a secure connection. For 12 weeks, participants exercised at home and also participated in weekly phone counseling sessions with the nurse, who provided personalized cardiac rehabilitation solutions and standard cardiac rehabilitation education. We assessed usability of the system, adherence to weekly exercise and walking goals, counseling session attendance, and disease-specific quality of life. RESULTS: Of 18 participants (age: mean 59 years, SD 7) who completed the 12-week telerehabilitation program, 6 (33%) were women, and 6 (33%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Participants wore the health watch for a median of 12.7 hours (IQR 11.1, 13.8) per day and completed a median of 86% of exercise goals. Participants, on average, walked 121 minutes per week (SD 175) and spent 189 minutes per week (SD 210) in their target exercise heart rate zone. Overall, participants found the system to be highly usable (System Usability Scale score: median 83, IQR 65, 100). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study established the feasibility of delivering cardiac telerehabilitation at home to acute myocardial infarction survivors via a health watch-based program and telephone counseling sessions. Usability and adherence to health watch use, exercise recommendations, and counseling sessions were high. Further studies are warranted to compare patient outcomes and health care resource utilization between center-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=18). MI-PACE home-based cardiac telerehabilitation program was evaluated on System Usability Scale (SUS) score. Participants in a 12-week home-based cardiac telerehabilitation program demonstrated high adherence, completing a median of 86% of exercise goals, and rated the system as highly usable with a median System Usability Scale score of 83.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: