Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solid‐state electrolytes are indispensable for all‐solid‐state batteries. Sulfide‐based solid electrolytes, such as Li 10 M P 2 S 12 ( M = Ge, Sn) and Li 6 PS 5 X ( X = Cl, Br, I), exhibit excellent ionic conductivities, with the fastest Li + ion conductor, Li 9.54 [Si 0.6 Ge 0.4 ] 1.74 P 1.44 S 11.1 Br 0.3 O 0.6 , achieving 32 mS cm −1 at room temperature. Phosphide‐based solid electrolytes have recently shown great potential with diverse structures and variable ionic conductivities. This compound class is expanded to the heavier homolog Li 3 Sb, showing its transformation to a superionic conductor through aliovalent substitution of lithium with scandium. Resulting Li 2.55 Sc 0.15 Sb shows an unexpected high ionic conductivity of 42(6) mS cm −1 at 298 K under electron‐blocking conditions in line with a very low activation energy of 17.6(8) kJ mol −1 , representing the highest and lowest reported values, respectively, for a solid Li‐ion conductor so far. Additionally, the compound exhibits a significant, but two orders of magnitude lower electronic conductivity making it a promising candidate for mixed ionic‐electronic conductor (MIEC). The series of new compounds Li 3−3 x Sc x Sb, maintains the β‐Li 3 Sb structure up to a nominal composition of x (Sc) = 0.15, with Sc 3+ ions occupying the tetrahedral voids of the face‐centered cubic Sb anion arrangement and creating vacancies that facilitate efficient Li + ion diffusion pathways. This work proposes a general design strategy for vacancy engineering in which replacement of Li with Sc in simple binary compounds has a direct impact on the ion mobility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: