Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study analyzes the effect of competition banks on credit risk in the dual banking system in Indonesia. Thisresearch was conducted using a purposive sampling technique in selecting a sample of 5 conventional commercial banksand 5 Islamic commercial banks. The method used is the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) from 2011 to2020. Credit risk for Conventional Banks is measured by the value of Non-Performing Loan (NPL), while IslamicBank Financing is measured by the value of Non-Performing Financing (NPF). The results of this study indicatethat Return on Assets (ROA) for Conventional Banks and Islamic Banks has a significant effect on credit risk inthe dual banking system, Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) for Conventional Banks does not have a significant effect onNon-Performing Loan (NPL) while Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) of Islamic Banks has a significant level 2influence on Non-Performing Financing (NPF). Bank size does not have a significant influence on credit risk in thedual banking system, and the Lerner Index for Conventional Banks has a significant effect on Non-Performing Loan(NPL), while the Lerner Index for Islamic Banks has no effect on Non-Performing Financing (NPF). The CentralBank in making policies can see that the level of competition for banks in the dual banking system in Indonesia iscategorized as a monopolistic competition market, where each bank has its own market segment so that it has marketpower that is strong enough to set prices that are relatively
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Febriana et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: