Key result
In patients without comorbidities, median NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in those with lung cancer (249 pg/mL) compared to controls with other pulmonary diseases (88 pg/mL).
Why the study?
High NT-proBNP levels have been demonstrated in various malignancies, but the clinical importance of NT-proBNP in lung cancer remains unclear.
Does the presence of lung cancer and its specific tumor characteristics affect serum NT-proBNP levels compared to non-malignant respiratory diseases?
Case-Control (n=225)
No
Does the presence of lung cancer and its specific tumor characteristics affect serum NT-proBNP levels compared to non-malignant respiratory diseases?
Absolute Event Rate: 249% vs 88%
p-value: p=0.001
NT-proBNP levels are significantly elevated in lung cancer patients without other comorbidities, particularly those with mediastinal invasion, suggesting its potential utility as a diagnostic biomarker.
High blood levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been shown in various malignancies. In lung cancer, the importance of NT-proBNP is not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the significance of the correlation of NT-proBNP levels in lung cancer with tumor stage, tumor diameter, histopathology, and specific sites of mediastinal metastasis: lymphadenopathy; pericardial, cardiac, major vessel, other mediastinal organ or lymphatic involvement/invasion. A total of 105 lung cancer and 120 control patients (chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary thromboembolism, and pneumonia; 30/subgroup) with measured NT-proBNP levels were included retrospectively. Demographics, comorbidities, and echocardiographic findings in all patients, as well as histologic subtype, diameter, stage, and radiologic and/or pathologic mediastinal involvement/invasion of the tumor to the mediastinum in patients with lung cancer, were studied with regard to blood NT-proBNP levels. When lung cancer and control groups were compared globally or as subgroups with comorbidities, NT-proBNP levels did not show meaningful differences. However, NT-proBNP levels were determined to be 249 pg/mL and 88 pg/mL in lung cancer (n=68) and control subgroups (n=58) without comorbidities, respectively (p=0.001). Among lung cancer patients without comorbidities and those with cardiac, pericardial, major vascular, or other mediastinal involvement/invasion (lymphadenopathy, lymphatic, or other organ invasion) (n=27), the NT-proBNP level was 303 pg/mL, whereas it was 166 pg/mL in those without these mediastinal invasions (n=41) (p=0.031). There is a need for much larger, randomized studies to obtain evidence for the potential role of NT-proBNP as a helpful diagnostic biomarker for lung cancer. Clinical suspicion of malignancy may be raised if high NT-proBNP levels cannot be explained by all other risk factors and disorders or diseases. Furthermore, pericardial, cardiac, major vessel, or other mediastinal invasion/involvement should be sought when high NT-proBNP levels are determined in lung cancer patients without any comorbidities or risk factors for high NT-proBNP levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İnan et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Lung cancer (n=225). Lung cancer vs. Non-malignant pulmonary diseases (COPD, ILD, PTE, pneumonia) was evaluated on Median NT-proBNP levels (pg/mL) in patients without comorbidities (p=0.001). In patients without comorbidities, median NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in those with lung cancer (249 pg/mL) compared to controls with other pulmonary diseases (88 pg/mL).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: