Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several studies support the hypothesis that low-dose botulinum toxin treatment may be as beneficial as high-dose regimen. Therefore, we studied 115 patients (aged 27-84; mean 58.0, SD = 12.9 years; 68% females, 32% males) suffering from cervical dystonia (n = 66), blepharospasm (n = 28), and facial hemispasm (n = 21) over a period of 2 years in an open label, non-controlled pilot study. Patients received low-dose treatment with botulinum toxin type A (Dysport((R))). The toxin was diluted in 20 ml of 0.1% albumin solution to arrive at a concentration of 25 MU/ml and injected under EMG control. Patients responded to the treatment about 1 week after injection (mean 7.3 days, SD = 4.6). The mean duration of beneficial effects was 11.7 weeks (SD = 5.6). Patients evaluated the clinical global improvement on a scale ranging from 0 to 4. For the whole population, the mean was 2.7 points (SD = 1.1). In none of the subjects could antibodies to botulinum toxin type A be detected, and only a few side effects were observed. In conclusion, low-dose therapy with botulinum toxin A merits further controlled studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rollnik et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: