Key result
Basal insulin peglispro increased small LDL and medium to large VLDL subclass concentrations compared to insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes previously on insulin.
Why the study?
Does basal insulin peglispro compared to insulin glargine alter lipoprotein particle concentrations and liver fat content in patients with diabetes?
RCT (n=652)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does basal insulin peglispro compared to insulin glargine alter lipoprotein particle concentrations and liver fat content in patients with diabetes?
Basal insulin peglispro treatment is associated with potentially pro-atherogenic changes in lipoprotein subclasses and increased liver fat content compared to insulin glargine in patients with diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant lipid subclass monitoring with peglispro; leaves open effects on cardiovascular outcomes versus glargine.
BACKGROUND: In Phase 2/3 studies of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) compared to insulin glargine, patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes previously treated with insulin and randomized to BIL had an increase in serum triglycerides (TGs). To further understand lipoprotein changes, a lipid substudy which included liver fat content was designed to assess relationships among the measured variables for each diabetes cohort and compare the hepato-preferential insulin BIL to glargine. METHODS: In three cohorts of patients with diabetes (type 1, type 2 insulin naïve, and type 2 previously on insulin; n = 652), liver fat content (LFC) was determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and blood lipids were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. Apolipoproteins, adiponectin, and other lipid parameters were also measured. Descriptive statistics were done, as well as correlation analyses to look for relationships among LFC and lipoproteins or other lipid measures. RESULTS: In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with BIL, but not glargine, small LDL and medium and large VLDL subclass concentrations increased from baseline. In patients with type 2 diabetes previously on insulin and treated with BIL, large VLDL concentration increased from baseline. In insulin naïve patients with type 2 diabetes treated with BIL, there were very few changes, while in those treated with glargine, small LDL and large VLDL decreased from baseline. Baseline LFC correlated significantly in one or more cohorts with baseline large VLDL, small LDL, VLDL size, and Apo C3. Changes in LFC by treatment showed generally weak correlations with lipoprotein changes, except for positive correlations with large VLDL and VLDL size. Adiponectin was higher in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to patients with type 2 diabetes, but decreased with treatment with both BIL and glargine. CONCLUSIONS: The lipoprotein changes were in line with the observed changes in serum TGs; i.e., the cohorts experiencing increased TGs and LFC with BIL treatment had decreased LDL size and increased VLDL size. These data and analyses add to the currently available information on the metabolic effects of insulins in a very carefully characterized cohort of patients with diabetes. Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers and dates NCT01481779 (2011), NCT01435616 (2011), NCT01454284 (2011), NCT01582451 (2012).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orchard et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes (n=652). Basal insulin peglispro vs. Insulin glargine was evaluated on Change from baseline in LDL particle concentration at 52 weeks. Basal insulin peglispro increased small LDL and medium to large VLDL subclass concentrations compared to insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes previously on insulin.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: