Key result
Intensive diabetes therapy was associated with larger LDL diameter and lower levels of small LDL (465 vs. 552 nmol/l, P=0.007) and small HDL compared to conventional management.
Why the study?
Does intensive diabetes management improve lipoprotein subclass profiles in patients with type 1 diabetes?
RCT (n=1,294)
Randomized
Does intensive diabetes management improve lipoprotein subclass profiles in patients with type 1 diabetes?
Intensive diabetes therapy in type 1 diabetes is associated with potentially favorable changes in LDL and HDL subclasses, which may contribute to reduced vascular complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lipid benefits from intensive diabetes therapy; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Our objective is to define differences in circulating lipoprotein subclasses between intensive versus conventional management of type 1 diabetes during the randomization phase of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). NMR-determined lipoprotein subclass profiles (NMR-LSPs), which estimate molar subclass concentrations and mean particle diameters, were determined in 1,294 DCCT subjects after a median of 5 years (interquartile range: 4-6 years) of randomization to intensive or conventional diabetes management. In cross-sectional analyses, we compared standard lipids and NMR-LSPs between treatment groups. Standard total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels were similar between randomization groups, while triglyceride levels were lower in the intensively treated group. NMR-LSPs showed that intensive therapy was associated with larger LDL diameter (20.7 vs. 20.6 nm, P = 0.01) and lower levels of small LDL (median: 465 vs. 552 nmol/l, P = 0.007), total IDL/LDL (mean: 1,000 vs. 1,053 nmol/l, P = 0.01), and small HDL (mean: 17.3 vs. 18.6 μmol/l, P < 0.0001), the latter accounting for reduced total HDL (mean: 33.8 vs. 34.8 μmol/l, P = 0.01). In conclusion, intensive diabetes therapy was associated with potentially favorable changes in LDL and HDL subclasses in sera. Further research will determine whether these changes contribute to the beneficial effects of intensive diabetes management on vascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Type 1 diabetes (n=1,294). Intensive diabetes therapy vs. Conventional diabetes management was evaluated on Small LDL levels (nmol/l) (p=0.007). Intensive diabetes therapy was associated with larger LDL diameter and lower levels of small LDL (465 vs. 552 nmol/l, P=0.007) and small HDL compared to conventional management.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: