Why the study?
Does an optimum radiotherapy technique reduce the calculated probability of cardiac complications in patients with early breast cancer compared to a standard technique?
Does an optimum radiotherapy technique reduce the calculated probability of cardiac complications in patients with early breast cancer compared to a standard technique?
Optimizing radiotherapy techniques in early breast cancer can substantially reduce the calculated probability of late cardiac complications, particularly for left-sided tumors.
Optimum technique may lower cardiac NTCP in left-sided breast radiotherapy; leaves open prospective outcome validation before practice change.
Cardiac damage is recognized to be a potentially serious side effect of breast cancer radiotherapy, the risk of which may be reduced by the choice of appropriate radiotherapy technique. We have previously described variation in physical dose to the heart dependent upon radiotherapy technique. In this paper we report the calculated improvement in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (for cardiac damage) achievable by these methods. Cardiac doses were calculated from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) using a "Helax" planning system for 11 patients with left-sided tumours and 5 patients with right-sided tumours. The DVH reduction algorithm of Lyman and Wolbarst [1989] was applied to each DVH to produce a value for the NTCP. For left-sided tumours, mean NTCP with the standard technique was 7.4 +/- 5.6% (range 0.6-17%) and for the optimum technique mean NTCP was 0.3 +/- 0.6% (range 0-2%) (p < 0.003 for the difference between the two techniques): a predicted reduction in late cardiac complications of 23-fold, which is not clearly evident from viewing the DVH raw data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canney et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: