Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparative study in vivo of amodiaquine efficacy (35 mg/kg over 3 d) and chloroquine (25 mg/kg over 3 d) was conducted in 1991 and 1992 in Cameroon and Congo in 123 patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Amodiaquine was more effective than chloroquine, with parasite clearance by day 7 in 79.7% of the patients compared with 59.4%. Sixteen of 32 (50%) P. falciparum isolates tested in vitro were resistant to chloroquine and only 3 of 34 (9%) were resistant to amodiaquine. 5.3% of patients treated with amodiaquine complained of pruritus and 18.7% of nausea, compared with 15.7% and 5% respectively of those treated with chloroquine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brasseur et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: