Key result
Isoproterenol administration for arrhythmia re-induction after catheter ablation did not significantly reduce AVNRT recurrence compared to control (1% vs 3.8%; HR 0.245; 95% CI 0.043-1.418; p=0.173).
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the effects of isoproterenol on arrhythmia recurrence in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia undergoing catheter ablation.
Does isoproterenol for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation reduce arrhythmia recurrence in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia?
RCT (n=206)
randomly assigned
Does isoproterenol for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation reduce arrhythmia recurrence in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia?
Hazard Ratio: 0.245 (95% CI 0.043–1.418)
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=.173
Routine use of isoproterenol for arrhythmia re-induction after radiofrequency ablation of AVNRT did not significantly reduce the rate of arrhythmia recurrence over 16.5 months.
Isoproterenol re-induction after AVNRT ablation offers no recurrence benefit; confirms null effect and supports omission from routine practice.
We aimed to determine the effects of isoproterenol on arrhythmia recurrence in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) patients treated with catheter ablation. The present randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on AVNRT patients candidates for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The patients were randomly assigned to receive isoproterenol (0.5-4 μg/min) or not (control group) for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation. The results of the electrophysiological (EP) study, the ablation parameters, and the arrhythmia recurrence rate were recorded. We evaluated 206 patients (53 males and 153 females) with a mean (SD) age of 49.87 (15.5) years in two groups of isoproterenol (n = 103) and control (n = 103). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two studied groups in age, gender, EP study, and ablation parameters. The success rate of ablation was 100% in both groups. During ~16.5 months of follow-up, one patient (1%) in the isoproterenol group and four patients (3.8%) in the control group experienced AVNRT recurrence (HR = 0.245; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.043-1.418; p = .173). Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of arrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up period between the two studied groups (p = .129). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the arrhythmia's recurrence according to age, gender, junctional rhythm, type of AVNRT arrhythmia, and DAVN persistence after ablation. Although isoproterenol administration for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation did not alleviate the treatment outcomes and arrhythmia recurrence following RFA in AVNRT patients, further studies with a larger sample size and a longer duration of follow-up are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lotfabadi et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=206). isoproterenol vs. control was evaluated on arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.245, 95% CI 0.043-1.418, p=.173). Isoproterenol administration for arrhythmia re-induction after catheter ablation did not significantly reduce AVNRT recurrence compared to control (1% vs 3.8%; HR 0.245; 95% CI 0.043-1.418; p=0.173).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: