Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of two dimensional largest ovarian area (LOA) as a predictive parameter of oocyte yield and pregnancy in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Methods: Ninety-two stimulated IVF cycles from sixty-eight infertile women were included. On the day 3 of cycles, antral follicle count (AFC) and LOA were measured by ultrasonography before starting gonadotropins. LOA was calculated by ellipsoid formula (D1×D2×0.8) using two perpendicular diameters in the largest cross-sectional view of each ovary and then summed. Results: Both LOA and AFC had a positive correlation with the number of retrieved oocytes. The best cut-off value of LOA was 6.14 cm2 for predicting poor ovarian response (area under curve [AUC], 0.783; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.684 to 0.862), 7.70 cm2 for predicting cycle cancellation (AUC, 0.794; 95% CI, 0.697 to 0.871) and 8.36 cm2 for predicting pregnancy (AUC, 0.641; 95% CI, 0.534 to 0.739). For AFC, the best cut-off value was 9 for poor ovarian response (AUC, 0.877; 95% CI, 0.792 to 0.936), 6 for predicting cycle cancellation (AUC, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.872 to 0.980) and 9 for pregnancy (AUC, 0.683; 95% CI, 0.578 to 0.776). The predictability for pregnancy was similar between LOA and AFC. Conclusion: LOA is easy to measure and a good marker for predicting ovarian response and IVF pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: