Key result
Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction increased 28-day mortality (35.9% vs 26.8%; p<0.01), with isolated right ventricle dysfunction being an independent risk factor (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.04-4.91).
Why the study?
Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction can involve both ventricles, but characteristics and outcomes across its various manifestations remain unknown.
Does right ventricle dysfunction increase 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock?
Cohort (n=778)
Does right ventricle dysfunction increase 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock?
Odds Ratio: 2.26 (95% CI 1.04–4.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 35.9% vs 26.8%
p-value: p=<0.01
In patients with septic shock, isolated right ventricular dysfunction is independently associated with increased 28-day mortality, highlighting the prognostic importance of RV assessment in sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.
Isolated RV dysfunction signals higher sepsis mortality risk; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes in prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) can involve both the left and right ventricles. However, the characteristics and outcomes across various manifestations of SIMD remain unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using a prospective registry of septic shock from January 2011 and April 2017. Patients with clinically presumed cardiac dysfunction underwent echocardiography within 72 hours after admission and were enrolled (n=778). SIMD was classified as left ventricle (LV) systolic/diastolic and right ventricle (RV) dysfunction, which were defined based on the American Society of Echocardiography criteria. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 778 septic shock patients who underwent echocardiography, 270 (34.7%) showed SIMD. The median age was 67.0 years old, and the male was predominant (57.3%). Among them, 67.3% had LV systolic dysfunction, 40.7% had RV dysfunction and 39.3% had LV diastolic dysfunction. Although serum lactate level and sequential organ failure assessment score were not significantly different between groups, SIMD group showed higher troponin I (0.1 vs 0.1 ng/mL; p=0.02) and poor clinical outcomes, including higher 28-day mortality (35.9 vs 26.8%; p<0.01), longer intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 2 days; p<0.01) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (9 vs 4 days; p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that isolated RV dysfunction was an independent risk factor of 28-day mortality (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.91). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with septic shock showed various myocardial dysfunctions. LV systolic dysfunction was common; however, only RV dysfunction was associated with short-term mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Septic shock (n=778). Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) and isolated RV dysfunction vs. No SIMD / No isolated RV dysfunction was evaluated on 28-day mortality (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.91, p=<0.01). Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction increased 28-day mortality (35.9% vs 26.8%; p<0.01), with isolated right ventricle dysfunction being an independent risk factor (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.04-4.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: