Key result
This editorial discusses the advancement of cardiovascular nursing science through high-quality reviews, presenting no quantitative clinical data.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Editorial on nursing science reviews; leaves open empirical testing of synthesized insights in cardiovascular practice.
Todd M. Ruppar, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN John L. and Helen Kellogg Professor of Nursing, Associate Professor, Department of Adult Health & Gerontological Nursing, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois. The author has no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. Correspondence Todd M. Ruppar, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN, Department of Adult Health & Gerontological Nursing, Rush University College of Nursing, 600 S Paulina St, Ste 1072A, Chicago, IL 60612 ([email protected]).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Todd Ruppar (2020) reported an editorial. This editorial discusses the advancement of cardiovascular nursing science through high-quality reviews, presenting no quantitative clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: