Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper explores several hypotheses about the appropriate education for entrepreneurship that encourages innovation: (1) breakthrough inventions are contributed disproportionately by independent inventors and entrepreneurs, while large firms focus on cumulative, incremental (and often invaluable) improvements; (2) education for mastery of scientific knowledge and methods is enormously valuable for innovation and growth but can impede heterodox thinking and imagination; (3) large-firm research and development (R&D) requires personnel who are highly educated in extant information and analytic methods, while successful independent entrepreneurs and inventors often lack such preparation; and (4) while procedures for teaching current knowledge and methods in science and engineering are effective, we know little about training for the critical task of breakthrough innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William J. Baumöl (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: