Key result
Mentored Ross procedures achieve similar 10-year survival compared to experienced surgeons.
Why the study?
Because few centers perform a high volume of Ross procedures, data on the safety of learning and teaching this complex procedure are limited.
Does mentoring the Ross procedure in adults compromise long-term survival and perioperative outcomes compared to procedures performed by an experienced primary surgeon?
Cohort (n=234)
No
Does mentoring the Ross procedure in adults compromise long-term survival and perioperative outcomes compared to procedures performed by an experienced primary surgeon?
Absolute Event Rate: 95.8% vs 94.4%
p-value: p=0.85
The technically complex Ross procedure can be safely mentored to less experienced aortic root surgeons without compromising patient survival or valve durability.
Supports mentoring the Ross procedure without survival compromise; extends observational training data but leaves practice change open.
Background Recent reports that the Ross procedure restores normal life expectancy in young adults with aortic valve disease have renewed interest in this complex procedure. Because only a few centers perform a high volume of Ross procedures, there are limited data on the safety of learning and teaching the Ross procedure. Methods A total of 234 consecutive adult patients at a single center underwent the Ross procedure performed by an experienced surgeon acting as the primary operator (n = 186; 1994-2021) or mentoring surgeon (n = 48; 2001-2021). Cumulative sum analysis of cardiopulmonary bypass times was performed to evaluate learning curves as primary surgeon and mentored surgeon. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate long-term survival and freedom from Ross-related reintervention. Results Patients' mean age was 42 ± 11 years; 169 (72%) were male. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between cohorts. Operative death occurred in 5 (2%) patients: 3 (2%) as primary surgeon and 2 (4%) as mentor ( P = .28). In-hospital reoperation was required in 8 (3%) patients: 6 (3%) as primary surgeon and 2 (4%) as mentor ( P = .75). Up to 10 years, there was no difference in survival between primary operator cases and mentored cases (94.4% [91.2%-97.9%]) vs 95.8% [90.3%-100%]; log-rank, P = .85). Conclusions Although the Ross procedure is technically complex, it can be taught to experienced aortic root surgeons without compromising short- or long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shih et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease (n=234). Ross procedure by mentored surgeon vs. Ross procedure by primary experienced surgeon was evaluated on Long-term survival at up to 10 years (p=0.85). The Ross procedure performed by a mentored surgeon yielded similar 10-year survival (95.8%) compared to cases performed by an experienced primary surgeon (94.4%, P=0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: