Key result
The Ross procedure resulted in 80% overall survival at 20 years, which was similar to the age- and gender-matched general population.
Why the study?
The Ross procedure offers an alternative to standard aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged patients, but durability and reoperation rates remain concerns for cardiac surgeons.
Does the Ross procedure result in favorable long-term survival and freedom from reoperation in adult patients?
Cohort (n=56)
No
Does the Ross procedure result in favorable long-term survival and freedom from reoperation in adult patients?
The Ross procedure in adults provides excellent long-term survival comparable to the general population and low reoperation rates at 20 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Ross consideration in select adults; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: The Ross procedure is an alternative to standard aortic valve (AV) replacement in young and middle-aged patients. However, durability and incidence of reoperation remain a concern for most cardiac surgeons. Our aim was to assess very long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of the Ross procedure. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 56 consecutive adult patients who underwent the Ross procedure. Mean age at surgery was 44±12 years (range, 16-65 years) and 55% were male. Clinical endpoints included overall mortality and the need for valve reoperation due to graft failure. The echocardiographic endpoint was the presence of any graft deterioration. Median clinical follow-up was 20 years (1120 patient/years). RESULTS: Indications for surgery were dominant aortic stenosis in 50% and isolated aortic regurgitation in 21%. Concomitant mitral valve repair was performed in 21% and a subcoronary technique was most commonly used (86%). Overall long-term survival was 91%, 80% and 77% at 15, 20 and 24 years, respectively. The survival rate was similar to the age- and gender-matched general population (p=0.44). During the follow-up period, freedom from graft reoperation was 80%. Eleven patients (31%) developed moderate AV regurgitation, three (8.6%) developed moderate pulmonary regurgitation and one (2.9%) presented moderate pulmonary stenosis. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure, mostly using a subcoronary approach, proved to have good clinical and hemodynamic results, with low reoperation rates in long-term follow-up. Moderate autograft regurgitation was a frequent finding but had no significant clinical impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerreiro et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease (n=56). Ross procedure vs. Age- and gender-matched general population was evaluated on Overall long-term survival at 20 years (p=0.44). The Ross procedure resulted in 80% overall survival at 20 years, which was similar to the age- and gender-matched general population.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: