Key result
Ross procedure yields ~76% 25-year survival, matching the general population with low reintervention rates.
Why the study?
Treatment of aortic-valve disease in young patients remains challenging, and the Ross procedure may offer advantages that improve long-term outcomes.
Does the Ross procedure improve overall survival in adult patients with aortic-valve disease?
Cohort (n=2,444)
Does the Ross procedure improve overall survival in adult patients with aortic-valve disease?
p-value: p=0.189
The Ross procedure offers excellent long-term survival equivalent to the general population up to 25 years, with very low rates of reintervention and anticoagulation-related morbidity in young adults with aortic valve disease.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of aortic-valve disease in young patients still poses challenges. The Ross procedure offers several potential advantages that may translate to improved long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study reports long-term outcomes after the Ross procedure. METHODS: Adult patients who were included in the Ross Registry between 1988 and 2018 were analyzed. Endpoints were overall survival, reintervention, and major adverse events at maximum follow-up. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for survival and the need of Ross-related reintervention. RESULTS: There were 2,444 adult patients with a mean age of 44.1 ± 11.7 years identified. Early mortality was 1.0%. Estimated survival after 25 years was 75.8% and did not statistically differ from the general population (p = 0.189). The risk for autograft reintervention was 0.69% per patient-year and 0.62% per patient-year for right-ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reintervention. Larger aortic annulus diameter (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12/mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.19/mm; p < 0.001) and pre-operative presence of pure aortic insufficiency (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.68; p = 0.01) were independent predictors for autograft reintervention, whereas the use of a biological valve (HR: 8.09; 95% CI: 5.01 to 13.08; p < 0.001) and patient age (HR: 0.97 per year; 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99; p = 0.001) were independent predictors for RVOT reintervention. Major bleeding, valve thrombosis, permanent stroke, and endocarditis occurred with an incidence of 0.15% per patient-year, 0.07% per patient-year, 0.13%, and 0.36% per patient-year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure provides excellent survival over a follow-up period of up to 25 years. The rates of reintervention, anticoagulation-related morbidity, and endocarditis were very low. This procedure should therefore be considered as a very suitable treatment option in young patients suffering from aortic-valve disease. (Long-Term Follow-up After the Autograft Aortic Valve Procedure [Ross Operation]; NCT00708409).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aboud et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in aortic-valve disease (n=2,444). Ross procedure vs. general population was evaluated on overall survival (p=0.189). The Ross procedure provided an estimated 25-year survival of 75.8%, which did not differ statistically from the general population (p=0.189), with low rates of reintervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: