Key result
Uterine activity, rather than maternal position, was associated with periodic maternal heart rate changes in 10.9% of women, with no observed effect on fetal heart rate patterns.
Why the study?
Does maternal position change affect maternal and fetal heart rates in pregnant women at term before elective cesarean section?
Observational (n=119)
No
Does maternal position change affect maternal and fetal heart rates in pregnant women at term before elective cesarean section?
In pregnant women at term, periodic decelerations of maternal heart rate are primarily associated with uterine activity rather than maternal position, with no effect on fetal heart rate patterns in low-risk pregnancies.
Maternal position should not guide intrapartum heart rate management; leaves open causal roles of uterine activity in prospective studies.
INTRODUCTION: Because little is known about the effects of maternal position on periodic changes in the maternal heart rate (MHR) in late pregnancy, a prospective observational study was done at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town. Pregnant women admitted for elective cesarean section were studied to determine the effect of changes in position on the maternal and fetal heart rates (FHR) and maternal blood pressure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Continuous transabdominal non-invasive recording of MHR, FHR patterns and uterine activity was done for 1 h in 119 women, using the AN24 device from Monica Health Care. Maternal position was changed every 15 min from lateral to supine, then to the other lateral position and finally supine again. Blood pressure was measured in the left arm and left lower leg three times during each 15-min period. RESULTS: MHRs were four beats per minute slower in the left lateral position than in the right lateral position. Periodic MHR changes were seen in 13 (10.9%) women. Most of these (84.6%) were associated with uterine activity and not with maternal position. No changes in FHR patterns were observed after position changes. CONCLUSIONS: In a subgroup of pregnant women at term, uterine activity was associated with periodic decelerations of the MHR. In low risk pregnancies there seems to be no effect on the FHR pattern. Implications for the compromised fetus have not yet been investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Pregnancy at term (n=119). Maternal position changes and uterine activity was evaluated on Periodic changes in maternal and fetal heart rates and maternal blood pressure. Uterine activity, rather than maternal position, was associated with periodic maternal heart rate changes in 10.9% of women, with no observed effect on fetal heart rate patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: