Key result
Neuroprotective agents show largely negative trial results in acute ischemic stroke, though select combinations warrant study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Developing new treatment strategies for acute ischemic stroke in the last twenty years has offered some important successes, but also several failures. Most trials of neuroprotective therapies have been uniformly negative to date. Recent research has reported how excitatory amino acids act as the major excitatory neurotransmitters in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Furthermore, other therapeutic targets such as free radical scavenger strategies and the anti-inflammatory neuroprotective strategy have been evaluated with conflicting data in animal models and human subjects with acute ischemic stroke. Whereas promising combinations of neuroprotection and neurorecovery, such as citicoline, albumin and cerebrolysin have been tested with findings worthy of further evaluation in larger randomized clinical trials. Understanding the complexities of the ischemic cascade is essential to developing pharmacological targets for acute ischemic stroke in neuroprotective or flow restoration therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuttolomondo et al. (2015) conducted a review in Acute ischemic stroke. Neuroprotective therapies was evaluated. Neuroprotective therapies for acute ischemic stroke have yielded mostly negative results in trials, though combinations like citicoline, albumin, and cerebrolysin warrant further clinical evaluation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: