Key result
SAFE@HOME digital platform linked to ~20% lower antenatal care costs vs. usual care.
Case-Control (n=230)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost analysis of the use of a new care pathway with a digital health platform for blood pressure telemonitoring for women at risk of preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cost analysis of a case-control study with women with chronic hypertension, history of preeclampsia, maternal cardiac or kidney disease at intake of pregnancy. Antenatal care with a reduced visit schedule and a digital health platform (SAFE@HOME, n = 97) was compared to a retrospective control group (n = 133) with usual care without self-monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs per pregnancy (€) of healthcare consumption of antenatal clinic visits, ultrasound assessments, antenatal admissions, laboratory and other diagnostic tests, and societal costs such as traveling and work absence. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and perinatal outcomes were similar between both groups. A significant reduction of antenatal visits, ultrasounds and hypertension-related admissions was associated with use of the digital platform. In the SAFE@HOME group, costs of antenatal care, including the costs of the digital platform, were 19.7% lower compared to the control group (median €3616 [IQR 3071 - 5329] vs €4504 [IQR 3515-6923], p = 0.001). Total costs per pregnancy, including societal costs, were also reduced (€7485 [IQR 6338-10,173] vs €9150, [IQR 7546-12,286] p < 0.001). Each euro invested in the platform saved on average €8 of antenatal care resources. CONCLUSION: The use of a digital platform for blood pressure and symptom monitoring in antenatal care for high-risk women is associated with lower costs compared to conventional care, while observed maternal and neonatal outcomes are similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heuvel et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Increased risk of preeclampsia (n=230). SAFE@HOME digital health platform and reduced visit schedule vs. Usual care without self-monitoring (retrospective control) was evaluated on Costs per pregnancy (€) of healthcare consumption of antenatal clinic visits, ultrasound assessments, antenatal admissions, laboratory and other diagnostic tests, and societal costs (19.7% reduction, p=0.001). The SAFE@HOME digital platform significantly lowered median antenatal care costs compared to usual care (€3616 vs €4504, p=0.001) in high-risk women, with similar maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: