Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate 6 extracted or exfoliated crowns of primary molars treated with different pulpotomy medicaments and techniques. Materials and Methods: Six pulpotomy treated primary molars were examined whole and after bisection. The medicaments used in the study were formocresol, ferric sulfate. A few were primary teeth treated withlaser pulpotomies and mineral trioxide aggregate. Theteeth were either extracted due to clinical and/or radiographic failures. The reasons for failure or success were discerned with the radiographs and light microscopic inspection of different sections of the teeth. Results: Reasons for each failure could be determined by the above examinations. The primary reason for failure was determined to be clinical technique errors by the clinicians. Conclusion: The success of pulpotomy is mostly dependent on the practical experience of the clinician, use of the appropriate materials and clinical technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulkarni et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: