Why the study?
Does longer drive time to Coronary Care Units and lower socioeconomic status reduce the likelihood of receiving timely PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=66,097)
Yes
Does longer drive time to Coronary Care Units and lower socioeconomic status reduce the likelihood of receiving timely PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Relative Risk: 0.84 (95% CI 0.8–0.88)
Geographic distance to Coronary Care Units and lower socioeconomic status are associated with reduced access to timely revascularization for acute myocardial infarction, highlighting disparities in healthcare access.
May indicate geographic barriers to timely AMI care; hypothesis-generating for access interventions.
BACKGROUND: Geographic and socioeconomic barriers may hinder fair access to healthcare. This study assesses geographic and socioeconomic disparities in access to reperfusion procedures in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients residing in Piedmont (Italy). METHODS: Coronary Care Units (CCUs) were geocoded with a geographic information system (GIS) and the shortest drive time from CCUs to patients' residence was computed and categorized as 0 to <20, 20 to <40 and ≥40 min. Using data on AMI emergency hospitalizations in 2004-2012, we employed a log-binomial regression model to evaluate the relation between drive time and use of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) occurring within 2 days after a hospitalization for an episode of AMI, and whether this relation varied depending on the period of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 29% of all cases with a diagnosis of AMI (n = 66 097), were revascularized within 2 days from the index admission. The further AMI patients lived from CCUs, the less likely they were to receive revascularization: compared with distance <20 min, RRs were respectively 0.84 [95% CI 0.80-0.88] and 0.78 [95% CI 0.71-0.86]. Findings also showed that less educated people had a lower relative risk of being revascularized compared to more educated people (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.74-0.82). Both inequalities have reduced in recent years. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of reduced geographical and socioeconomic differences in revascularization use over time. Geography and socioeconomic status should not determine the type of treatment received for life-threatening conditions such as AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=66,097). Increased drive time to Coronary Care Units (20 to <40 min) vs. Drive time <20 min was evaluated on Use of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) occurring within 2 days after hospitalization for AMI (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: