Key result
Left ventricular rapid pacing using a guidewire is a safe and effective alternative to traditional right ventricular pacing during TAVR, potentially reducing procedure time and cost.
Why the study?
Intraprocedural rapid-pacing techniques during TAVR have lagged behind minimalist approaches, prompting the need to outline best practices for left ventricular guidewire pacing.
Does left ventricular rapid pacing utilizing the left ventricular guidewire improve safety, effectiveness, and procedure time compared to traditional right ventricular temporary pacing in patients undergoing TAVR?
Comparison
Left ventricular guidewire pacing vs traditional right ventricular temporary pacing
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Left ventricular pacing may offer a minimalist TAVR alternative; leaves open confirmation versus right ventricular pacing in prospective trials.
Does left ventricular rapid pacing utilizing the left ventricular guidewire improve safety, effectiveness, and procedure time compared to traditional right ventricular temporary pacing in patients undergoing TAVR?
Left ventricular rapid pacing via guidewire during TAVR is a safe and effective alternative to traditional right ventricular pacing, supporting a minimalist approach and potentially reducing procedure time and costs.
Blusztein et al. (2023) conducted a review in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Left ventricular rapid pacing using a guidewire vs. Traditional right ventricular temporary pacing was evaluated. Left ventricular rapid pacing using a guidewire is a safe and effective alternative to traditional right ventricular pacing during TAVR, potentially reducing procedure time and cost.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: