Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article compares the G eary– S tark method for distributing known GDP totals across regions with a variation suggested by C rafts. Tests of the G eary– S tark method confirm that it generates accurate estimates of regional GDP . There are practical and conceptual problems with C rafts' extension, and it is not tested nor is it testable. New estimates of regional GDP for the period 1861 to 1911 contradict C rafts's suggestion of rising regional inequality. Purchasing power parity adjustments do not alter this trend. The new estimates confirm I reland's post‐ F amine catch‐up. The great bulk of I rish labour productivity growth can be accounted for by an upward shifting production function, though it can be argued that that portion of growth that represents catch‐up may be attributable to labour force decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geary et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: