Why the study?
Does isolated aortic valve replacement result in acceptable mortality and survival in patients older than 65 years?
Does isolated aortic valve replacement result in acceptable mortality and survival in patients older than 65 years?
Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients over 65 carries a reasonable operative risk and provides satisfactory postoperative rehabilitation and survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support isolated AVR in older patients; leaves open relevance to contemporary outcomes and selection.
The results of 196 isolated aortic valve replacements in patients older than 65 years were analyzed. Eighty-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV preoperatively. The operative mortality was 12% for all cases and 9% for elective cases. Actuarial probability of five-year survival was 55% for the entire group and 61% for discharged patients. Myocardial failure and congestive heart failure were the most common causes of early and late postoperative death, respectively. Embolic strokes occurred in 16% of discharged patients and caused substantial disability in 9%. At the termination of the study, 94% of surviving patients were in NYHA class I or II, and none were in class IV. Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients entails reasonable operative risk, and results in satisfactory postoperative rehabilitation. (JAMA237:1578-1581, 1977)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. G. Copeland (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: