Key result
Novel non-invasive dyssynchrony assessment methods and conduction system pacing techniques may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Do new pacing techniques and novel non-invasive methods improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with HFrEF?
Do new pacing techniques and novel non-invasive methods improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with HFrEF?
Conduction system pacing and novel ECG/echocardiographic criteria hold promise to reduce the ~30% non-response rate seen with traditional biventricular pacing in HFrEF.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
András Vereckei (2024) conducted an editorial in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Conduction system pacing and novel non-invasive dyssynchrony assessment vs. Standard biventricular pacing and traditional QRS criteria was evaluated. Novel non-invasive dyssynchrony assessment methods and conduction system pacing techniques may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: