Key result
Echocardiographic tools assessing mechanical dyssynchrony can accurately predict whether heart failure patients will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
Can echocardiographic tools assessing mechanical dyssynchrony predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure?
Can echocardiographic tools assessing mechanical dyssynchrony predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure?
Echocardiographic assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony is a valuable tool for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.
Heart failure is a major epidemic. Many people with heart failure struggle with refractory symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Those with severe left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular conduction delay are at significant risk from either dying suddenly or dying from progression of their heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves hemodynamics and symptoms of heart failure and has recently been shown to improve survival. One problem facing the use of CRT is that 30% of patients fail to respond. The dominant theory is that QRS duration (electrical dyssynchrony) does not accurately reflect mechanical dyssynchrony. Echocardiographic tools have recently been developed that enable clinicians to assess the degree of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients being considered for CRT. These tools are able to predict with a significant amount of accuracy whether a patient will respond to CRT. This allows for a more refined approach to evaluating patients for CRT and optimizing the treatment of congestive heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miske et al. (2005) conducted a review in Heart failure. Echocardiographic tools to assess mechanical dyssynchrony was evaluated. Echocardiographic tools assessing mechanical dyssynchrony can accurately predict whether heart failure patients will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: