Key result
Computed tomography angiography remains the standard for lifelong endoleak surveillance post-EVAR, though contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography may serve as complementary tools.
While CTA remains the standard for post-EVAR endoleak surveillance, CEUS and MRA serve as valuable complementary modalities to reduce cumulative radiation and nephrotoxic contrast exposure.
CTA remains first-line for post-EVAR surveillance; leaves open validation of CEUS/MRA in prospective trials.
Endoleaks are a common complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). As a result, patients require lifelong imaging surveillance following EVAR. In current clinical practice, evaluation for endoleaks is predominantly performed with CT angiography (CTA). Due to the significant cumulative radiation burden associated with repetitive CTA imaging, as well as the repeated administration of nephrotoxic contrast agent, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have evolved as potential modalities for lifelong surveillance post-EVAR. In this paper, multimodality imaging, including CTA, CEUS and MRA, for the surveillance of endoleaks is discussed. Further, new CTA techniques for radiation reduction are elaborated. Additionally, imagery for three cases of aortic endoleak detection using CTA and five cases using MRA are presented. Imaging for different types of endoleaks with CTA, MRA and CEUS are presented. For lifelong endoleak surveillance post-EVAR, CTA is still regarded as the imaging modality of choice. However, advancements in CEUS and MRA technique enable partial replacement of CTA in certain patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Partovi et al. (2018) conducted a review in Endoleaks post-endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Multimodality imaging (CTA, CEUS, MRA) was evaluated. Computed tomography angiography remains the standard for lifelong endoleak surveillance post-EVAR, though contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography may serve as complementary tools.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: