This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
One can easily obtain a good estimate of the total energy E(Z) of a ground-state neutral atom with Z ({}1) electrons, primarily because an effective central potential Veff(r) provides a very good starting point. A sufficient, if not necessary, condition for there to be such a Veff is for the ratio {ρ}(Z){≡}V_e-e(Z)/V_e-ν(Z) of the electron-electron and electron-nuclear contributions to E(Z) to be small, and it is found to be only about (1/7) for large Z. In the (statistical) nonrelativistic Thomas-Fermi (TF) model, which becomes exact as Z{~}{∞}, E(Z) (in rydbergs) is approximated by E_TF(Z)=-c₇Z7/3 for all Z, with c₇ a known constant, while {ρ}(Z) is approximated by ρTF(Z)=(1/7) for all Z. A simple proof that {ρ}(Z){~}(1/7) as Z{~}{∞}, by Rau (unpublished) and by Thirring [Quantum Mechanics of Large Systems (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983)], used only the assumption (built into TF theory) that the binding energy of the last electron in a neutral atom is negligible.We use that fact, the (recently developed) corrected TF result E(Z) {}-(c₇{Z}7/3$+${c}₆Z6/3+c₅{X}5/3$) (with ${c}₇$, ${c}₆$, and ${c}₅$ theoretically determined), and the virial theorem, and we show that ${V}_{e{{-}}{ν}}(Z)Z(dE/dZ) with an error that is at most of order{Z}4/3$; we thereby obtain an expression for {ρ}(Z) which approaches (1/7) as Z{~}{∞}, the error for large Z being of order 1/Z, and is reasonably accurate even for moderate values of Z. One finds {ρ}(Z){}J(n-6)sₙ/Jnsₙ, where each sum is over n=7, 6, and 5, and where sₙ=cₙ{Z}^{(n{{-}}7)/3}$. The value of {ρ}(Z) for heavy atoms in ``strong'' magnetic fields, those describable by a one-dimensional (statistical) TF-like theory, is discussed briefly. Some numerical studies are included. The results obtained are of interest in atomic theory itself, and in low-energy {β}-decay processes for which the difference in atomic binding energies is important.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: