Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 23, 2015BMC Public HealthOpen Access

Lessons learned from the AFLY5 RCT process evaluation: implications for the design of physical activity and nutrition interventions in schools

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RJRussell JagoUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustEREmma L. RawlinsUniversity of CambridgeRKRuth KippingUniversity of Bristol

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Jago et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f508f6c240de38cdb70dahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2293-1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors influencing the adoption of a Health Promoting School approach in the province of Quebec, Canada2009 · 48 citations
  2. 2Sociocultural Influence on Obesity and Lifestyle in Children: A Study of Daily Activities, Leisure Time Behavior, Motor Skills, and Weight Status2017 · 1,184 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial2014 · 103 citations
  4. 4Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies2014 · 1,612 citations
  5. 5Randomised controlled trial adapting US school obesity prevention to England2008 · 83 citations