Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 21, 2022Transboundary and Emerging DiseasesOpen Access

A systematic review of the methods used to analyze the economic impact of endemic foot‐and‐mouth disease

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

A systematic review of 64 articles on the economic impact of endemic foot-and-mouth disease found that methods were generally poorly reported, with a median quality score of 41%.

Why the study?

Foot-and-mouth disease has large economic consequences in livestock systems, requiring robust assessment to support disease control policy.

Design

Systematic review

Authors

PCPolly CompstonThe Pirbright InstituteGLGeorgina LimonThe Pirbright InstituteBHBarbara HäslerFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Diverse methods in endemic FMD economic analyses limit policy comparability; leaves open need for standardization.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review (n=64)

Structured PICO

P
Population
64 articles analyzing the economic impact of endemic foot-and-mouth disease across 26 countries.
E
Exposure
Economic analysis methods for FMD and its control
O
Outcome
Methods used within economic analyses of FMD and its control, and quality assessment scores

Economic analyses of endemic foot-and-mouth disease are generally poorly reported with methodological gaps, risking inefficient resource allocation for control programs.

Limitations

  • The CHEERS tool used for quality assessment is from human health economics and may not directly correspond to animal health economics
  • Binary scoring system may lead to scoring discrepancies due to subjectivity in evaluating incomplete reporting
  • Inconsistent terminology used across the included studies

Cite This Study

Compston et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Endemic foot-and-mouth disease (n=64). Economic analysis methods was evaluated on Quality assessment score of economic analyses. A systematic review of 64 articles on the economic impact of endemic foot-and-mouth disease found that methods were generally poorly reported, with a median quality score of 41%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f587da528af2d65c2f24chttps://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14564
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement2013 · 1,774 citations
  2. 2Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage2019 · 174 citations
  3. 3R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing2000 · 363,589 citations
  4. 4Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria2005 · 876 citations
  5. 5Epistemic injustice in academic global health2021 · 462 citations