Key result
Combined eccentric or traditional resistance and aerobic training for 16 weeks significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 19% and 21%, respectively (p=0.001 for both) in older hypertensive women.
Why the study?
Does combined resistance and aerobic training improve blood pressure, biochemical profiles, and strength in elderly hypertensive women?
RCT (n=60)
randomly assigned
Does combined resistance and aerobic training improve blood pressure, biochemical profiles, and strength in elderly hypertensive women?
Combined eccentric or traditional resistance and aerobic training effectively improves blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, and muscle strength in elderly hypertensive women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding combined resistance-aerobic training for BP control in older hypertensive women; extends RCT evidence on multimodal exercise effects.
Both aerobic (AT) and resistance training (RT) are recommended as nonpharmacological treatments to prevent hypertension. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating the effects of combined exercise modes (RT combined with AT) in elderly hypertensive women. Thus, our aim was to compare the postexercise hypotension (PEH) response to both protocol models and to assess the correlation between the degree of PEH after acute and chronic training. Furthermore, we also compared several biochemical variables for each training group. Sixty hypertensive older women were randomly assigned into nonexercised control (no systematic exercise training throughout the study), eccentric RT (ERT), and traditional RT (TRT). The training programs consisted of 16 weeks of RT combined with AT. Blood pressure (BP), biochemical profiles, and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) were evaluated. There was a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) after both training regimens pre- to posttraining (combined ERT +5% and TRT +7%; p = 0.001 for both). There was a decrease in systolic BP (SBP) (combined ERT -19% and TRT -21%; p = 0.001 for both) and diastolic BP (DBP) (-13% for both; p = 0.001 for both). There was an increase in bench press 1RM (combined ERT +54% and TRT +35%; p = 0.001 for both) and leg press 1RM (combined ERT +52% and TRT +33%; p = 0.001 for both). The magnitude of decrease in SBP after acute exercise was moderately correlated with the drop in SBP after chronic training for the ERT combined with AT group (r = 0.64). Both combined training protocols are effective in promoting benefits in health-related factors (HDL, SBP, DBP, and 1RM). Considering the lower cardiovascular stress experienced during combined ERT, this type of training seems to be the most suitable for elders, deconditioned individuals, and hypertensives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=60). Combined eccentric or traditional resistance and aerobic training vs. Nonexercised control was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.001). Combined eccentric or traditional resistance and aerobic training for 16 weeks significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 19% and 21%, respectively (p=0.001 for both) in older hypertensive women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: