Why the study?
Does flosequinan improve hemodynamic parameters primarily through positive inotropy or vasodilation in canine models of heart failure?
Does flosequinan improve hemodynamic parameters primarily through positive inotropy or vasodilation in canine models of heart failure?
Flosequinan's hemodynamic effects in normal and heart failure models are primarily driven by catecholamine-independent positive inotropy rather than balanced vasodilation.
Supports inotropic predominance in canine models; hypothesis-generating and leaves open human translation.
Flosequinan (BTS 49465) is a putative, selective direct-acting balanced vasodilator currently undergoing evaluation for the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. We examined the pharmacologic action of flosequinan and compared it to milrinone and nitroprusside (SNP). In ferret papillary muscle, in vitro, flosequinan (1-100 microM) increased the rate of force development up to 116%. The effect was not blocked by nadolol (10 microM). Flosequinan was less effective than milrinone and SNP as a relaxant of canine renal and coronary arteries, in vitro, since 100 microM of flosequinan produced less than 50% relaxation of the arteries, whereas milrinone or SNP (100 microM) produced between 85 and 125% relaxation of the precontracted arteries. Flosequinan, SNP, and milrinone (100 microM) completely relaxed precontracted canine mesenteric veins. Fifteen minutes after intraduodenal administration (i.d.) of flosequinan (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg) to anesthetized dogs (n = 7), mean left ventricular (LV) dP/dT increased by 11, 27, and 54%, respectively, whereas total peripheral resistance (TPR) decreased by 4, 4, and 13%, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased by 7, 14, and 23%, respectively. flosequinan was 4.6 times more potent as a positive inotrope than as a vasodilator. The hemodynamic profile of milrinone was similar to that of flosequinan, except milrinone produced greater increases in LV dP/dT and decreases in MAP and TPR. In contrast, SNP (1, 3, and 10 micrograms/kg/min i.v.) decreased TPR (7, 18, and 34%, respectively) and MAP (14, 32, and 41%, respectively) without any increase in LV dP/dT. In dogs with propranolol-induced heart failure (PIHF), flosequinan (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg, i.d.) increased mean myocardial dP/dT by 54 and 84% (n = 5) and MAP, but decreased TPR. The data show that (a) the hemodynamic effects of flosequinan in the normal and PIHF dogs were primarily due to positive inotropy rather than to arterial vasodilation and (b) the positive inotropic effect of flosequinan is independent of catecholamines, since it occurred in dogs with PIHF. The beneficial effect of flosequinan in patients with CHF may not be mediated by balanced vasodilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenberg et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: