Key result
A 7-variable clinical scoring system accurately predicted hand-foot-mouth disease in children under 3 years old, achieving an AUC of 0.804 in the training set and 0.76 in the test set.
Why the study?
To develop a clinical scoring system with improved accuracy for diagnosing hand-foot-mouth disease.
Does a 7-variable clinical scoring system accurately diagnose hand-foot-mouth disease in pediatric patients presenting with acute rash illness?
Observational (n=1,435)
No
Does a 7-variable clinical scoring system accurately diagnose hand-foot-mouth disease in pediatric patients presenting with acute rash illness?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.804 (95% CI 0.773-0.835)
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel 7-variable clinical scoring system provides a rapid, low-cost method with moderate accuracy for diagnosing typical and atypical hand-foot-mouth disease in young children.
Background:The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) with improved accuracy.Methods: A retrospectiveanalysis was performed on standardized patienthistory and clinicalexamination data obtained from 1435 pediatric patients under the age of three years who presented with acute rash illness and underwent enterovirus nucleicaciddetection. Patients were then divided into the HFMD (1094 patients) group or non-HFMD (341 patients) group based on a positive or a negative result from the assay, respectively. We then divided the data into a training set (1004 cases, 70%) and a test set (431 cases, 30%) using a random number method. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on 15 clinical variables (e.g. age, exposure history, number of rash spots in a single body region) to identify variables highly predictive of a positive diagnosisin the training set.Using the variables with high impact on the diagnostic accuracy, we generated a scoring system for predicting HFMDand subsequently evaluated this system in the test set.Results: Using the logistic model, we identified seven clinical variables (age, exposure history,and rash density at specific regions of the body) to be included into the scoring system. The final scores ranged from −5 to 24 (higher scores positively predicted HFMD diagnosis).Through our training set,a cutoff score of 7resulted ina sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.68. The area under the receiver operating characteristiccurve(AUC)was 0.804 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.773–0.835)(P < 0.001). Using the test set, we obtained an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.710–0.810) with a sensitivity of 0.76 and a specificity of 0.62. These results from the test set were consistent with those from the training set.Conclusions:This study establishes an objective scoring system for the diagnosis of typical and atypical HFMD using measures accessible through routine clinical encounters. Due to the accuracy and sensitivity achieved by this scoring system, it can be employed as a rapid, low-cost method for establishing diagnoses in children with acute rash illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hand-foot-mouth disease (n=1,435). Clinical scoring system vs. PCR-based viral nucleic acid sequence detection was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) of the scoring system in the training set (AUC 0.804, 95% CI 0.773-0.835, p=<0.001). A 7-variable clinical scoring system accurately predicted hand-foot-mouth disease in children under 3 years old, achieving an AUC of 0.804 in the training set and 0.76 in the test set.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: