This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The purpose of this study was to compare two intervention strategies, Tai Chi (TC) (n = 12) and Matter of Balance (MOB) (n = 13) on balance and fall efficacy of older adults (≥65 years) as compared to a control group (n = 12). The study compared changes in balance and fall efficacy of the two strategies in an effort to evaluate fall reduction programs for future application. Participants were assessed via a pretest to post-test, 8-10 weeks apart using two balance tests: 8-Foot Up and Go test and the Multi-Directional Reach Test. Fall efficacy was measured with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Results from this study indicate that the TC group and MOB group were both effective in improving or maintaining balance and fall efficacy as compared to the control group. Results demonstrated trending toward TC as having a greater impact on participants’ overall balance measures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skalko et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: