Why the study?
RDW and epicardial fat tissue are novel cardiovascular risk factors, but their relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus had not been investigated.
Are epicardial fat tissue thickness and red blood cell distribution width increased and correlated in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Are epicardial fat tissue thickness and red blood cell distribution width increased and correlated in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Epicardial fat tissue thickness and red blood cell distribution width are significantly increased and positively correlated in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, suggesting they may serve as linked markers of cardiovascular risk.
RDW-EFT association in diabetes is hypothesis-generating; larger prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Aim: Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and epicardial fat tissue (EFT) are considered as a novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, their relationship in patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) has never investigated before. Materials and Methods: Our study was a single-center prospective study which included 159 diabetic patients and 153 healthy controls. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographic examination was performed using standard apical, parasternal, and subcostal views in all the study participants. Results: EFT thickness and RDW were found to be significantly higher in diabetic patients compared to controls (4.3 ± 1.1 mm vs. 3.7 ± 1.0 mm P = 0.001 and 13.5 ± 0.7 vs. 13.2 ± 0.9 P = 0.044, respectively). EFT thickness and RDW were positively correlated. RDW value of 13.55 predicted EFT thickness >5 mm with a sensitivity of 61.7% and specificity of 58.8% (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.649 and P = 0.001). HgA1C value of >7 predicted EFT thickness ≥4.15 mm with a sensitivity of 60.7% and specificity of 60.4% (AUC: 0.651 and P < 0.001). No correlation found between RDW and HgA1C (AUC: 0.554 and P: 0.169). Conclusion: EFT thickness increased in diabetic patients, independent of age, gender, waist circumference, body mass index, and it was correlated with RDW and HgA1C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldız et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: