Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated CO2 and temperature are altering the interactions between plants and insects with important implications for food security and natural ecosystems. Ecologically, the acceleration of plant phenology by warming is generating mismatches between plants and insect pollinators. Similarly, shifting the rate of plant development relative to insect development can amplify or minimize the consequences of herbivory. Warming also enables some insects to increase the number of generations per year, thus increasing damage to plant communities. The suitability of plant tissues as food for insects also is modulated by global change. Elevated CO2 typically increases the concentration of leaf carbohydrates and in combination with elevated temperature decreases nitrogen (N) content. Together, these changes lower nutritional value, causing certain herbivores to consume more foliage to meet their nutritional needs. Whereas the responses of primary metabolites in plants to global change are reasonably well understood, how elevated CO2 and temperature affect plant defensive compounds (allelochemicals) is considerably less predictable. Recent studies indicate that exposure to elevated CO2 suppresses the plant defense hormone jasmonic acid (JA) while stimulating production of salicylic acid (SA). By differentially affecting defense compounds, these changes in plant hormones potentially increase susceptibility to chewing insects and enhance resistance to pathogens. Exposure to elevated temperature, in contrast, stimulates JA, ethylene (ET), and SA, enhancing defenses. A deeper understanding of how elevated CO2 and temperature, singly and in combination, modulate plant hormones promises to increase our understanding of how these elements of global change will affect the positive and negative interactions between plants and insects. Chemoautotrophs notwithstanding, plants provide energy in the form of carbohydrates for all nonphotosynthetic organisms, including insects. Not long after the colonization of land by plants 510 million years ago, plants and insects have engaged in an evolutionary arms race that continues today—plants evolve mechanisms to minimize consumption by insects, and insects evolve mechanisms to circumvent these defenses. Rapid changes in Earth’s atmosphere initiated by the human use of fossil fuels is resetting this complex coevolutionary relationship, not only between plants and herbivores but also between plants and their mutualistic partners, including pollinators. Insects have the potential to cause enormous reductions in crop yields and the productivity of natural ecosystems, as well as to provide irreplaceable pollination services that underpin much of the world’s agriculture. The combustion of fossil fuels during the Industrial Revolution initiated a rapid rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration that is accelerating today; preindustrial levels were approximately 280 μL L−1 and below 300 μL L−1 for the previous 20 million years (Pearson and Palmer, 2000). Today’s atmosphere is approximately 397 μL L−1, and at current rates of fossil fuel combustion, the atmospheric CO2 concentration will double relative to the preindustrial level in the latter half of the 21st century (IPCC, 2007). In addition to directly affecting plant physiology, this increase in CO2, a potent greenhouse gas, is causing an unprecedented rate of planetary warming. Global average temperatures already have increased by 0.8°C, and the last two decades of the 20th century were the warmest in at least four centuries, and possibly in several millennia. At current rates of fossil fuel use, global mean temperatures will rise by 4°C by the end of the 21st century. Because of the complex relationships between plants and insects, both favorable and detrimental from the plant’s perspective, how this “one-two punch” of elevated CO2 and elevated temperature will affect plant-insect interactions is difficult to anticipate. Whereas most herbivorous insects do not respond directly to changes in CO2 in the atmosphere (Fig. 1; Guerenstein and Hildebrand, 2008), as exotherms they can be very sensitive to temperature, which affects their life cycle, population size, and geographic distribution (Bale et al., 2002). Populations of many insect herbivores are strongly regulated by invertebrate predators (top down), which also respond to temperature. In this update, we take the “plant’s perspective” and focus on our current understanding and major unresolved questions about how these two major elements of global change, elevated CO2 and temperature, affect insect populations and their relationship with plants. We will elaborate on the concept of ecological mismatches, where global change disrupts the synchrony between plants and insects. Then we will consider how global change affects plants as food for insects, including their chemical defenses, and how changes in leaf chemistry modulate herbivory. We conclude with a discussion of new findings that may reveal the mechanisms governing the interactions between plants, insects, and global change. Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects plant-insect interactions through its direct effects on plant metabolism and elevated temperature through its direct effect on plant and insect metabolism. Some insects respond directly to elevated CO2 during oviposition, when foraging for live or dead plant material belowground, or when foraging for nectar, for example (Goyret et al., 2008). At current and projected future levels of atmospheric CO2, the primary effect of elevated CO2 on the suitability of plant tissues as food is mediated largely through changes in plant chemistry and morphology. The activities of plants and insects often are coordinated in time—pollinators arrive just when flowers are ready, or feeding larvae enter a resting state (diapause) just as their host plant senesces. The synchrony between plants and insects is mutually constrained by their ecological and evolutionary relationships, yet rising atmospheric CO2 and global temperature challenge the status quo by altering leaf chemistry and advancing phenology. This perturbation increases the selection pressure for asynchrony and, as a result, an increasing number of plant and insect interactions have been characterized as ecologically “mismatched” (Wolkovich et al., 2012). The rapid advancement of plant phenology by global change brings into question how pollinators and herbivores will keep pace. From the plant’s perspective, rising CO2 increases carbohydrate levels in nectar (Erhardt et al., 2005) and drives greater reproductive investment in many plant species (Jablonski et al., 2002). Sweeter nectar favors some pollinators, such as certain bees and flies (Petanidou, 2005), but not all pollinators (Hoover et al., 2012). The interaction between elevated CO2 and temperature further complicates our understanding of plant interactions with pollinators. For example, elevated CO2 accelerates flowering time for entomophilic C3 species (Springer and Ward, 2007), yet rising temperatures may reduce nectar production by limiting water or by reducing flower longevity (Hoover et al., 2012; Wolkovich et al., 2012). It is important to note that the interactive effects of rising CO2 and temperature as manifested through pollinators remain largely unexplored (but see Hoover et al., 2012). It is likely that pollinator mismatches may be less common among generalists given the long history of adaptation to natural perturbations in climate (e.g. glaciation), but of greater importance for specialist plant-pollinator interactions. Comparisons of historical collections with observations of flight across the last decade indicate many generalist bees avoid mismatches by keeping pace with climate-induced advances in plant phenology (Bartomeus et al., 2011). For herbivorous insects, mismatches may be more prevalent as traditional host plant resources decrease in availability and nutritional suitability. For example, the comma butterfly (Polygonia c-album) altered its host preference from Humulus lupulus to Ulmus glabra and Urtica dioica, with a corresponding increase in insect performance (Braschler and Hill, 2007). Polyphagous species or those that undergo recent host switching or inclusion events (see also the brown argus butterfly [Aricia agestis]; Pateman et al., 2012) are not constrained by host range and thus are able to expand within their temperature optima faster than the plants on which they feed. This polyphagy may enable insects to track changing climate and move onto new plant resources. How plant resources and defense chemistries have changed, however, remains to be investigated and may resolve mechanisms underlying the host switch. Taken together, these patterns indicate natural selection may go a long way in resolving current mismatches. Global change not only modulates the beneficial relationship between plants and their pollinators, it also alters the magnitude of damage caused by herbivores. The largest ecosystem across the United States, the soybean (Glycine max)-corn (Zea mays) rotation, suffers substantial herbivory from the invasive Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) on soybean. Because soybean is tolerant to herbivory during vegetative development when beetles emerge, damage has little effect on yield (Fig. 2). Earlier emergence of Japanese beetles caused by progressively warmer winters and spring should further reduce the potential for defoliation-induced yield losses by Japanese beetles (Fig. 2). The invasive soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) reduces soybean yield at moderate densities, in part because of its prevalence during reproductive stages when soybean is more vulnerable to herbivory (Fig. 2). As with beetles, if warming causes aphids to move from their alternate host, buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) trees, to soybeans earlier when beans are more tolerant of herbivore damage, then warming may reduce potential yield reductions and management costs. The consequences of insect damage depend on its timing relative to plant development. In soybean, the sensitivity of seed yield to leaf area removal by herbivory varies strongly among developmental stages (V, vegetative; R1, beginning bloom; R2, full bloom; R3, beginning pod; R4, full pod; R5, beginning seed; from National Crop Insurance Service publication 6302), where a 60% reduction in leaf area during R5 results in greater than 20% yield reduction, but no detectable yield reduction if the same leaf area removal occurs during vegetative growth. The dates (right) for different developmental stages are for soybean in the SoyFACE experiment (Castro et al., 2009). Vertical bars represent the time when Japanese beetles and soybean aphids are abundant (97% of the total annual population), and the black bars represent times of peak abundance (beetles in central Illinois: 26% of total population; Van Timmerman et al., 2000; aphids in southern Wisconsin: approximately 60% of total population; http://www.plantpath.wisc.edu/soyhealth/aglycine.htm). the timing of insect relative to plant development will its effect on seed insect species typically respond to increasing temperatures with an increase in development reproductive and number of generations within a (Fig. 1; and 2000). of these responses are likely to increase the magnitude of with on plant these global warming has effects on herbivore the number of life that can be in a In many insect life are than and In the of is by temperature, is and by human As temperatures insect development can be such that the sensitive the that is not to the development. were of insects an within a to increases in global however, have increased the of of in years of of patterns in central and that a substantial of the species in their an increased of and generations with species a increase in the number of generations after From the plant perspective, generations of on plants, can unprecedented levels of damage the of a damage may increase the of and and reproductive The of in the between and in the of of 2008). on a warmer temperatures are with increased species in for increase in temperature, the species of increases in a by species and plants are vulnerable to effects of have mechanisms for for of leaf from can be and to production of to can be and can be relative to et al., et al., 2012). however, can these mechanisms et al., et al., 2009). How plants can from on size, of foliage and of is about of events from studies of plant species that are for et al., The that and increases to and as well as and 2012). In can cause leaf of carbohydrate et effects of by on to in and the most of and of herbivory as a of herbivore responses to warming temperatures may be to which do not typically many species of depend on production of to that can be by of and beetles the of their by way of coordinated that the and increase the of The beetle for example, during which of can In the increasing temperatures have in an of more than a in the of the flight and it has been that in some this species can a and 2012). Similarly, the beetle is an species that can and and temperatures are with a in and the potential for a in central in the and of insect damage to can potentially global change, as of in and are to the atmosphere et al., 2012). In of developmental acceleration and changes in herbivore are likely to more in the these the of on should be a The of foliage as a food for insects on the concentration of primary which often the of insects, carbohydrates that can as feeding and that can Insects foliage elevated CO2 often this food less than foliage current Whereas is among insect and between feeding (e.g. on rates when CO2 foliage are in lower and et al., 2012). that elevated CO2 reduces insect rates by altering the chemical and of foliage is that insects consume more an average of to lower consumption of food to meet is to as and may greater herbivore damage to both and natural as CO2 continues to increase 2011). How elevated CO2 affects plant primary metabolism and some of leaf chemistry is well For plants the C3 is the the of CO2 into This below its at current CO2 the rate of and for C3 plants increases strongly with rising CO2 et al., and 2007). This of drives a number of changes in primary affecting the suitability of to herbivorous insects. including and typically increase in foliage elevated CO2, and, from by increased carbohydrates or leaf decreases and et al., 2012). carbohydrates and levels an average increase in plant et al., 2012). Because chewing insects in are strongly by the of their they consume more foliage to meet their nutritional needs. of including and leaf also respond to elevated CO2 and affect with the of leaf less is about these leaf area the of leaf area to leaf is a for leaf decreases elevated CO2 and et al., directly reducing the suitability of foliage to insects. The increase in per leaf area with a decrease in also leaf content. Because they are elevated temperature directly affects insect metabolism (Fig. their life ecological and geographic The direct effect of elevated temperature can be (e.g. et al., often stimulating herbivory and but little is about how elevated temperature modulates herbivory through changes in leaf chemistry (Fig. Elevated temperature can suitability to insect herbivores directly by leaf carbohydrate concentration through its effect on and and through its on plant development. the effect of temperature on the concentration of on is below or its it difficult to how this of leaf suitability will change In a exposure to elevated temperature in the range in the to years leaf and total carbohydrates and Whereas elevated temperature no effect on the of (e.g. and as is the with elevated CO2, it also causes a reduction in leaf content. in combination, elevated temperature the increase in leaf carbohydrates caused by elevated CO2, but the effect of both elements of global change to amplify decreases in leaf causing substantial increases in leaf and The direct of insect metabolism by elevated temperature with the reduction of leaf by the combination of elevated temperature and CO2 that these elements of global change may increase herbivory in the The discussion the enormous in plant and insect responses to global change, and some of this can be by the of the mechanisms generating of remain Elevated CO2 causes changes in leaf chemistry in than and little or no change in leaf carbohydrates in plants as from In the reductions in are considerably in than species et al., 2012). the causes of in the of primary plant metabolites to elevated CO2 and temperature is a a full understanding of how these elements of global change affect and, the full of responses of herbivorous insects, remains The coevolutionary arms race with herbivorous insects has a of defensive compounds (allelochemicals) in plants. of these compounds are in levels in plant tissues but rise to in to herbivory. how global change will affect the production of and their effects on herbivory remains a challenge that is by the of primary and metabolism in plants et al., Whereas no has been in the of including and to global change, and and 2008), some are elevated CO2 stimulates the production of and and suppresses the production of and et al., 2012). This that elevated CO2 favors the acid to the production of and suppresses the acid and to the production of is about how elevated temperature, singly or in combination with elevated CO2, affects In of the including elevated temperature increases the production of of some but decreases and 2008). Elevated temperature also increases the production of compounds and compounds by plants, including leaf and many in plant and The of that a plant is and that a the et al., 2009). Elevated CO2 may directly the of some by its effect on but the production of plants by elevated CO2 and the direct of metabolism by elevated temperature will likely increase the production of in the the responses between some plants and insects and the complex coevolutionary relationships between it is not that of production elevated CO2 and temperature is complex and often species of our understanding of how elevated CO2 in affects the production of is and a deeper understanding of the mechanisms these responses may reveal greater It is important to note that most to plant and insect responses to global change have not been in an evolutionary and thus do not how will to rapid increases in CO2 and temperature and 2012). is within populations in that elevated CO2 can be a potent and Similarly, for generations on a that foliage elevated CO2 the carbohydrates the of et al., A of the of plants and insects to global change will to consider potentially important mechanisms of The of a defense with the of insect in plant damage and insect singly or in combination, the but our understanding of the mechanisms governing the of herbivory is and and are by and amplify which the in JA, as well as and SA, hormones that plant development and chemical and insects, such as aphids and caused by chewing insects is with rapid of and at the and chemical responses of plants are an of defense that such as temperature or elevated CO2 by altering plant that in affects defensive and the plant-insect interaction et al., et al., 2012). studies are the that elevated CO2 alters chemical largely by hormone In elevated CO2 from the such as the and reduces and et al., et al., 2012). CO2 atmosphere increased the susceptibility of soybean to Japanese beetle and by and elevated CO2 increases levels in soybeans and in and in two of et al., et al., Japanese beetles feeding and on soybean elevated elevated CO2 increases leaf carbohydrates and reduces the concentration of defensive which increase the suitability of foliage for damage and the number of Japanese beetles, as well as of insects, are greater in to elevated with CO2 et al., et al., 2008). The effects of elevated CO2 on and in soybean increased the concentration of such as with and but the concentration of defenses, such as the and et al., et al., are the in soybeans and the of greater herbivory elevated In elevated CO2 the in four different of and 2011). The of by plants also with the production of or Elevated CO2 the of compounds in and the of the specialist et al., Elevated CO2 is not the only global change affecting temperature also can have an effect on in to insect The combination of temperature and herbivory in in greater than when and 2002). In with elevated CO2, temperature increases and et al., which also results in levels of chemical (e.g. and and 2011). temperatures increased regulated by such as and in many plant species and 2011). In temperature the production of and the both regulated by et al., 2011). chemical responses regulated by to temperature the resistance of plants to both insects and when in a et al., et al., 2007). the less interactive effects of elevated CO2 with temperature on plant production that the of by temperature the susceptibility of plants to herbivore by elevated CO2 et al., 2012). that exposure to elevated CO2 or temperatures modulates and, that responses of plant hormones some of the in the responses of Whereas the of the may defense insects and and 2011). This is elevated CO2, which and and increases susceptibility to herbivore et al., et al., et al., 2011). in CO2 and chemical defense that are not regulated by et al., et al., 2011). the the of defense compounds plant and this resistance with a lower of in soybeans et al., the mechanisms by which elevated CO2 alters the to herbivory are not the and its to the state of the may a the relationship between and et al., et al., 2007). elevated CO2 alters state by affecting the of for and et al., 2008), as well as acid concentration and total et al., 2011). et that and the between are by changes that to reduction of the in a by It may be to and and as the changes in and with changes in defense and 2011). In with the interaction between and elevated CO2, elevated temperature stimulates the production of JA, and SA, increasing the production of and plant resistance to and insect herbivores et al., et al., et al., 2009). may be in the relationship between plant defensive chemistry and elevated temperature. Exposure to elevated temperatures the production of in plants by damage and 2000). In addition to with which as a during plant and in and resistance et al., The hormone also increases in to elevated temperature et al., and through its positive interaction with JA, it may modulate the plant defense The effect between and is mediated by et al., and or that the of the the levels of in plants in CO2 enable the between and which increases the susceptibility to insect chewing insects, and resistance to et al., et al., et al., 2011). the of with and in plants temperatures the effect between and JA, herbivores and et al., et al., et al., 2009). our understanding of how elevated CO2 and temperature, singly and in combination, affect the complex interactions between JA, and will enhance our to changes in and the relationship between plants and herbivorous insects. their in plant defense it may be that the for et al., 2012) and et al., have been The relationship between plants and insects that in some results in crop losses and, in production through pollination is altered by global climate change. some of these changes are well understood, remain How elevated CO2 and temperature affect the primary chemistry of including leaf carbohydrate and leaf is well understood, as is how these changes affect the performance of many herbivorous insects. CO2 and temperature, however, are increasing in and for primary plant our of the interactive effects of these two elements of global change remains less is about how these elements of global change affect plant and the responses of herbivorous insects to these The of defensive by plants and the responses of generalist and specialist herbivores to these challenge of cause and Recent studies of how elevated CO2 and temperature modulate and plant defense in advancing our to how global change will affect plant-insect interactions. how global change will affect the ecological and evolutionary relationships between plants and insects remains as these interactions all and interactions at lower Whereas many or most generalist herbivores may be host switching to changes in plant phenology and many or most may to ecological studies have the interactive effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on plant-insect interactions at level of the of natural and food security will a deeper understanding of these We for on an earlier of this and we are to our for into the of plants and insects. nitrogen leaf area jasmonic acid ethylene salicylic acid
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeLucia et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: