This review discusses the design, pharmacology, and comparative effectiveness of newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent platforms in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Newer DES predominate clinically; leaves open optimal platform selection among current iterations.
Despite the remarkable benefits obtained following the introduction of the first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), concerns were raised over its long-term safety, particularly with regard to very late (beyond 1 year) stent thrombosis. Newer-generation DESs have been developed to overcome this limitation using novel stent platforms, new drugs, more biocompatible durable polymers, and bioabsorbable polymers or backbones. To date, new-generation DESs have virtually replaced the use of first-generation DESs worldwide. In this review article, we discuss in detail the design, pharmacology, and mechanism of action of the newer-generation permanent and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting platforms. Furthermore, we present and evaluate the current evidence on the performance and safety of these devices compared to those of other available stent platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ielasi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: