Why the study?
Does celecoxib reduce the risk of death and recurrent congestive heart failure compared to rofecoxib or NSAIDs in elderly patients with congestive heart failure?
Does celecoxib reduce the risk of death and recurrent congestive heart failure compared to rofecoxib or NSAIDs in elderly patients with congestive heart failure?
In elderly patients with congestive heart failure, celecoxib is associated with a lower risk of death and recurrent heart failure compared to rofecoxib and traditional NSAIDs.
Hypothesis-generating for celecoxib preference in elderly HF; prospective RCTs needed before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of death and recurrent congestive heart failure in elderly patients prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to determine whether there are class differences between celecoxib and rofecoxib. DESIGN: Population based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Databases of hospital discharge summaries and prescription drug claims in Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: 2256 patients aged 66 or more prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, or an NSAID after an index admission for congestive heart failure between April 2000 and March 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to all cause death and recurrent congestive heart failure, combined and separately. RESULTS: The risk of death and recurrent congestive heart failure combined was higher in patients prescribed NSAIDs or rofexocib than in those prescribed celecoxib (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.57 and 1.27, 1.09 to 1.49, respectively). The findings were similar when the outcomes were assessed separately. In pairwise analysis, the risks of death and recurrent congestive heart failure, combined and separate, were similar between patients prescribed NSAIDs and rofecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib seems safer than rofecoxib and NSAIDs in elderly patients with congestive heart failure. Differences were found among cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudson et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: