Why the study?
Does the everolimus-eluting stent reduce late lumen loss, binary restenosis, and target lesion revascularization in patients with small-vessel coronary disease?
Does the everolimus-eluting stent reduce late lumen loss, binary restenosis, and target lesion revascularization in patients with small-vessel coronary disease?
This review highlights the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents in reducing restenosis and target lesion revascularization in the challenging context of small-vessel coronary disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support everolimus-eluting stent use in small vessels; leaves open dedicated randomized confirmation.
Smaller coronary arteries are less able to accommodate late loss after percutaneous coronary interventions than larger arteries. The first-generation drug-eluting stents have been shown to have better control of neo-intimal hyperplasia and lower late lumen loss compared with bare-metal stents. However, the reported rates of binary restenosis are still unsatisfactory and small target vessel interventions remain challenging. Recently, a study using a subset of the SPIRIT III trial has demonstrated that the everolimus-eluting stent lowered late lumen loss, rates of binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent. In this article, we review previous studies evaluating small-vessel interventions and focus on the everolimus-eluting stent in this clinical entity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: