Why the study?
Does a thin strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent improve clinical outcomes compared to a durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does a thin strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent improve clinical outcomes compared to a durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, a thin-strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent demonstrated comparable 1-year safety and efficacy to a durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent.
Supports BP-SES evaluation in AMI; leaves open comparative efficacy versus DP-EES.
INTRODUCTION: The biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents were developed to improve vascular healing. However, further data are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). AIM: We sought to determine the 1-year clinical follow-up in patients with AMI treated with a thin strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) versus a durable coating everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES). MATERIAL AND METHODS: = 1054) with available 1-year clinical follow-up using propensity score matching. Outcomes included target vessel revascularization (TVR) as the efficacy outcome and all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and definite/probable stent thrombosis as safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The thin-strut biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes at 1 year after implantation to the DP-EES. These data support the relative safety and efficacy of BP-SES in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gąsior et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: