Why the study?
Cardiogenic shock maintains a high mortality rate of 40% to 60%, prompting the use of machine learning to integrate data for optimizing early diagnostic predictions and suggesting clinical courses.
Does machine learning software accurately predict the early development of cardiogenic shock?
Does machine learning software accurately predict the early development of cardiogenic shock?
Machine learning models demonstrate strong predictive accuracy (AUC-ROC 0.82) for the early detection of cardiogenic shock, highlighting their potential as clinical decision support tools pending prospective validation.
May aid early cardiogenic shock prediction; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS) withholds a significantly high mortality rate between 40% and 60% despite advances in diagnosis and medical/surgical intervention. To date, machine learning (ML) is being implemented to integrate numerous data to optimize early diagnostic predictions and suggest clinical courses. This systematic review summarizes the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) accuracy for the early prediction of CS. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted within databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Clinical Key/MEDLINE, Embase, GoogleScholar, and Cochrane. Cohort studies that assessed the accuracy of early detection of CS using ML software were included. Data extraction was focused on AUC-ROC values directed towards the early detection of CS. RESULTS: , respectively. Collectively, 159 (22.8%) mortalities were reported following early CS detection. Altogether, the AUC-ROC value was 0.82 (α = .05), deeming it of superb sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: From the present comprehensively gathered data, this study accounts the use of ML software for the early detection of CS in a clinical setting as a valid tool to predict patients at risk of CS. The complexity of ML and its parallel lack of clinical evidence implies that further prospective randomized control trials are needed to draw definitive conclusions before standardizing the use of these technologies. BRIEF SUMMARY: The catastrophic risk of developing CS continues to be a concern in the management of critical cardiac care. The use of ML predictive models have the potential to provide the accurate and necessary feedback for the early detection and proper management of CS. This systematic review summarizes the AUC-ROCs accuracy for the early prediction of CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alemán et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: