Why the study?
Breathing rate provides critical diagnostic and prognostic monitoring data, but the performance of different empirical mode decomposition variants for extracting breathing rate from photoplethysmogram signals had not been systematically compared.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ICEEMDAN and EEMD combined with PCA are optimal methods for extracting breathing rate from PPG signals.
Breathing rate (BR) is a significant bio marker that provides both prognostic and diagnostic information for monitoring physiological condition. In addition to vital bio markers, such as blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate, BR can be extracted from non-invasive and wearable pulse oximeter based photoplethysmogram (PPG). Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and its noise-assisted variants are widely used for decomposing non-linear and non-stationary signals. In this work, the effect of all variants of EMD in extracting BR from PPG has been investigated. We have used an EMD family PCA based hybrid model in extracting BR from PPG, which is a natural extension of our previously developed ensemble EMD (EEMD) PCA hybrid model. The performance of each model has been tested using two different datasets: MIMIC and Capnobase. Median absolute error varied from 0 to 5.03 and from 2.47 to 10.55 breaths/min for MIMIC and Capnobase dataset, respectively. Among all the EMD variants, EEMD-PCA and improved complete EEMD with adaptive noise (ICEEMDAN) PCA hybrid model present better performance for both datasets. This is the first study to compare EMD variants performance for decomposing real world signal and determine that from current methods, ICEEMDAN and EEMD are optimal for estimating BR from PPG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: