Atmospheric carbon dioxide is the raw material for the biosphere. Therefore, changes in the carbon isotopic composition of the atmosphere will influence the terrestrial δ 13 C signals we interpret. However, reconstructing the atmospheric δ 13 C value in the geologic past has proven challenging. Land plants sample the isotopic composition of CO 2 during photosynthesis. We use a model of carbon isotopic fractionation during C3 photosynthesis, in combination with a meta–data set (519 measurements from 176 species), to show that the δ 13 C value of atmospheric CO 2 can be reconstructed from the isotopic composition of plant tissue. Over a range of pCO 2 (198–1300 ppmv), the δ 13 C value of plant tissue does not vary systematically with atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. However, environmental factors, such as water stress, can influence the δ 13 C value of leaf tissue. These factors explained a relatively small portion of variation in the δ 13 C value of plant tissue in our data set and emerged strongly only when the carbon isotopic composition of the atmosphere was held constant. Members of the Poaceae differed in average δ 13 C value, but we observed no other differences correlated with plant life form (herbs, trees, shrubs). In contrast, over 90% of the variation the carbon isotopic composition of plant tissue was explained by variation in the δ 13 C value of the atmosphere under which it was fixed. We use a subset of our data spanning a geologically reasonable range of atmospheric δ 13 C values (−6.4‰ to −9.6‰) and excluding C3 Poaceae to develop an equation to reconstruct the δ 13 C value of atmospheric CO 2 based on plant values. Reconstructing the δ 13 C value of atmospheric CO 2 in geologic time will facilitate chemostratigraphic correlation in terrestrial sediments, calibrate pCO 2 reconstructions based on soil carbonates offer a window into the physiology of ancient plants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arens et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: