Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article features the results of a survey of the 50 State Departments of Education regarding their definitions of learning disabilities, identification criteria, and operationalization procedures. A conceptual framework consisting of 10 components is presented for analyzing the data in terms of definition and identification criteria. Results show a significant impact of the 1977 federal definition and criteria while revealing variations in state definitions and criteria. To determine current trends the data are compared with those from a similar survey conducted in 1976. Survey findings are discussed in terms of trends, heterogeneity of LD, and the NJCLD definition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mercer et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: