Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the association between symptoms and the risk of NSTEMI based on sex and age in emergency department patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Specific chest pain characteristics, such as radiation to both arms and exertional pain, strongly predict NSTEMI in patients with suspected ACS, with minimal variation by age or sex.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Symptom-NSTEMI associations differ by sex and age; leaves open whether these interactions should inform ED risk stratification pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the association between symptoms and risk of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients admitted to an emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome based on sex and age. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study conducted between September 2015 and May 2019. SETTING: University hospital in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 1506 participants >18 years of age (39.6% women and 31.0% 70 years of age or older). FINDINGS: The OR for NSTEMI was 9.4 if pain radiated to both arms, 3.0 if exertional chest pain was present during the last week and 2.9 if pain occurred during activity. Men had significantly lower OR compared with women if pain was dependent of position, respiration or palpation (OR 0.17 vs 0.53, p value for interaction 0.047). Patients <70 years had higher predictive value than older patients if they reported exertional chest pain the last week (OR 4.08 vs 1.81, 95%, p value for interaction 0.025) and lower if pain radiated to the left arm (OR 0.73 vs 1.67, p value for interaction 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain with radiation to both arms, exertional chest pain during the last week and pain during activity had the strongest predictive value for NSTEMI. The differences in symptom presentation and risk of NSTEMI between sex and age groups were small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: WESTCOR study ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02620202).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steiro et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: