Why the study?
Patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock due to predominantly right ventricular failure after revascularization remain sparsely characterized.
Does predominantly right ventricular failure compared to left ventricular failure affect 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing revascularization?
Does predominantly right ventricular failure compared to left ventricular failure affect 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing revascularization?
In AMICS patients undergoing revascularization, predominantly RV failure presents with similar hemodynamic severity to LV failure but is associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality.
AIMS: The objective was to describe patient characteristics, interventions, and outcome in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS), due to predominantly right ventricular (RV) failure after revascularization, in comparison with patients suffering from left ventricular (LV) failure as these patients remain sparsely characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, consecutive AMICS patients admitted to either of two tertiary heart centres, covering 3.9 million citizens, corresponding to two-thirds of the Danish population, were identified and individually reviewed through patient records. A total of 1716 AMICS patients were identified, of which 1482 underwent acute revascularization and included for analysis. Hereof, 101 (7%) patients developed cardiogenic shock due to predominantly RV failure, while 1381 (93%) had significant LV involvement. Female sex was the only demographic factor associated with RV failure (35% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Despite having a preserved LV ejection fraction, patients with predominantly RV failure were comparable to patients with LV involvement, in terms of haemodynamic and metabolic profile, here among variables commonly used in the cardiogenic shock definition including blood pressure (82 mmHg vs. 83 mmHg, P = 0.90) and lactate level (5.7 mmol/L vs. 5.4 mmol/L, P = 0.70). Patients with RV AMICS had significantly lower 30-day mortality than LV AMICS, and this result persisted after multivariable adjustment (RV vs. LV; hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.92, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In contemporary AMICS patients undergoing revascularization, patients with predominantly RV failure had comparable haemodynamics and metabolic derangement on admission compared to patients with LV failure but was associated with female sex and a significantly lower 30-day mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Josiassen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: